The computing requirements on servers are very different than regular laptops and desktops built for daily usage, and there is a whole type of business CPU developed especially for workstations and servers. AMD and Intel are two of this market’s main competitors, AMD with its Opteron processors and Intel with its Xeon processors. There is intense competitiveness between the two firms, as in the other CPU markets, and this tension is really pushing the technology ahead quite quickly. read this As part of data-intensive business applications, server class CPUs usually have to do very complicated calculations, and they often need to work effectively in a multi-task setting, because they are frequently called upon to execute several tasks at once. Thanks to their enormous computing capacity, and the reality that they are mostly in operation 24 hours a day, servers may have heavy power consumption demands, rendering energy performance increasingly a key element in CPU design.
The new Intel and AMD cloud class products vary greatly from a technical point of view. Intel’s newest Xeon cpus are built on a revamped version of their Westmere Nehalem design and have 6 cores whereas AMD’s current Opteron CPU is focused on their updated Magny-Cours design and has 12 cores. It ensures that the AMD processors, including the Intel CPUs, have double the amount of cores, or different computing units, and multiple threads will operate concurrently without losing on output in principle. However, because they have higher clock speeds, the total power generated by each core on the Intel processors is larger, negating any of this gain. Which one is stronger depends on the programs to be managed, and how they are willing to take advantage of the extra cores. Probably a lot of applications won’t profit from providing such a huge number of cores, and a significant amount of computing capacity will stay unharnessed. The Intel Xeon processors would be a more reasonable decision from this point of view, because each core would be more likely to be utilized, and the additional computing capacity accessible to each core on the would help the Xeon run better than the Opteron. However, the Opteron’s 12 cores also come into their own with applications that can really take advantage of the additional cores, as further computing operations can be done in tandem.